top of page

Mandela Effects As Experiments?

Q2548 You are witnessing something [firsthand] that many cannot possibly comprehend or accept as reality [Sci-Fi or precision M_planning?][VIDEO 1]

Have you ever been convinced that something is a particular way only to discover you’ve remembered it all wrong? If so, it sounds like you’ve experienced the phenomenon known as the Mandela Effect. …or are ordinary citizens being used as an experiment?

This form of collective misremembering of common events or details first emerged in 2010, when countless people on the internet falsely remembered Nelson Mandela was dead. It was widely believed he had died in prison during the 1980s. In reality, Mandela was actually freed in 1990 and passed away in 2013 – despite some people’s claims they remember clips of his funeral on TV.

Paranormal consultant Fiona Broome coined the term “Mandela Effect” to explain this collective misremembering, and then other examples started popping up all over the internet. For instance, it was wrongly recalled that C-3PO [VIDEO 2]from Star Wars was gold, actually one of his legs is silver. Likewise, people often wrongly believe that the Queen in Snow White says, “Mirror, mirror on the wall”. The correct phrase is “magic mirror on the wall”. [VIDEO 3] [1] Well, I beg to differ on this one, since u/saevitiasnape U SAE VITIA SNAPE posted in reddit an image of an old “Snow White” book found at Goodwill. [2] Seems to me it was in fact Hollywood that changed “mirror, mirror” to “magic mirror”. Is this another example of a government experiment in conjunction with Hollywood on all of us?

Fiona Broome explains the Mandela Effect via pseudoscientific theories. She claims that differences arise from movement between parallel realities (the multiverse). This is based on the theory that within each universe alternative versions of events and objects exist. Broome draws comparisons between existence and the holodeck of the USS Enterprise from Star Trek. The holodeck was a virtual reality system, which created recreational experiences. By her explanation, memory errors are software glitches. This is explained as being similar to the film The Matrix. I personally, disagree with her theory, as her theory is only speculation. I personally find the psychological findings more plausible.

Other theories propose that the Mandela Effect evidences changes in history caused by time travelers. Then there are the claims that distortions result from spiritual attacks linked to Satan, black magic or witchcraft. But although appealing to many, these theories are not scientifically testable.

Where’s the science? Yet, with the principalities of darkness, there is no science available to test it, so there we have it.

Psychologists explain the Mandela Effect via memory and social effects – particularly false memory. This involves mistakenly recalling events or experiences that have not occurred, or distortion of existing memories. The unconscious manufacture of fabricated or misinterpreted memories is called confabulation. In everyday life confabulation is relatively common.

False memories occur in a number of ways. For instance, the Deese-Roediger and McDermott paradigm demonstrates how learning a list of words that contain closely related items – such as “bed” and “pillow” – produces false recognition of related, but non presented words – such as “sleep”. Q2676 "This is not another 4-year election."

There’s a theory online that nuclear research experiments caused the world to shift into an alternate reality where Donald Trump became president. Is our government perfecting the psychology behind this phenomenon to the extent they are able to create the perfect environment to create their desires?

Shutterstock Memory inaccuracy can also arise from what’s known as “source monitoring errors”. These are instances where people fail to distinguish between real and imagined even. US professor of psychology, Jim Coan, demonstrated how easily this can happen using the “Lost in the Mall” procedure.

This saw Coan give his family members short narratives describing childhood events. One, about his brother getting lost in a shopping mall, was invented. Not only did Coan’s brother believe the event occurred, he also added additional detail. When cognitive psychologist and expert on human memory, Elizabeth Loftus, applied the technique to larger samples, 25% of participants failed to recognise the event was false.

When it comes to the Mandela Effect, many examples are attributable to so called “schema driven errors”. Schemas are organized “packets” of knowledge that direct memory. In this way, schemas facilitate understanding of material, but can produce distortion.

Frederic Bartlett outlined this process in his 1932 book Remembering. Barlett read the Canadian Indian folktale “War of the Ghosts” to participants. He found that listeners omitted unfamiliar details and transformed information to make it more understandable.

This process is called “effort after meaning” and occurs in real world situations too. For instance, research has previously shown how when participants’ recall the contents of a psychologist’s office they tend to remember the consistent items such as bookshelves, and omit the inconsistent items – like a picnic basket.

The pseudoscientific belief puts differences between memories and the real world down to glitches caused by time travel. Pexels Schema theory explains why previous research shows that when the majority of participants are asked to draw a clock face from memory, they mistakenly draw IV rather than IIII. Clocks often use IIII because it is more attractive.

Other examples of the Mandela Effect are the mistaken belief that Uncle Pennybags (Monopoly man) wears a monocle, and that the product title “KitKat” contains a hyphen (“Kit-Kat”). But this is simply explained by over-generalisation of spelling knowledge.

Back to reality

Frequently reported errors can then become part of collective reality. And the internet can reinforce this process by circulating false information. [VIDEO4] For example, simulations of the 1997 Princess Diana car crash are regularly mistaken for real footage.

In this way then, the majority of Mandela Effects are attributable to memory errors and social misinformation. The fact that a lot of the inaccuracies are trivial, suggests they result from selective attention or faulty inference.

Indeed, the notion of parallel universes is consistent with the work of quantum physicists. But until the existence of alternative realities is established, psychological theories appear much more plausible. What are your thoughts on this strange phenomenon? My mind is completely boggled. [1]

Q2882 Coincidence days after this post? We have everything. Q


The Conversation “The ‘Mandela Effect’ and how your mind is playing tricks on you”

February 12, 2018 5.20am Neil Dagnall




Mandela Effect 2019 update to haters Anthony117 Truth Seeker Published on Apr 22, 2019


C-3PO Has a Silver Leg Now 2016 Mandela Effect Quick and Dirty Published on Oct 5, 2016

[3] Snow white, the Queen and the Magic Mirror 1

1rusty3 Published on Mar 10, 2014


1997 Princess Diana collision reconstructed with msmac3D in 1998

Brian McHenry Published on Apr 5, 2013

#qanon #qanondecodes #weepingangelII #WeepingAngelII #mandelaeffect

42 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page