SerialBrain2 decodes Q: Saving Private Kavanaugh and the 3 Coliseum Gladiators.

SB2 decodes Q: Saving Private Kavanaugh and the 3 Coliseum Gladiators.

There is a general rule in political communication: when you want to shoot someone or something, you need to make a pause after you aim. This pause is to allow the watching crowd to cheer and build an energetic consensus around your final choice. When you follow this simple rule, you don’t waste your time explaining the things you do because the people in the crowd think they ordered you to do what you do. If a group of people still challenges you after your final choice, it will have to make its way through the majority before getting to you. Pretty cool right? It’s not modern politics, it’s very ancient. Look: video.

As you will see, in the coming images, the politician from the movie Gladiator identifies the wishes of the crowd after a quick assessment of the enthusiasm in the arena. In modern days, we use polls for the same purpose. By the way, this is a perfect example of how power de-concentration favors the emergence of a strong private sector but this is a topic for another day. Relax socialists.

This example does not give much control to the Politician. He has to comply with public opinion and essentially becomes a conduit for its wishes.

But what if the crowd in the arena is prepared before the fight and has received damning information about the defeated gladiator? What if the crowd is informed the defeated gladiator is a true menace to society, a rapist, a merciless killer and what not? Chances are the crowd will ask for his death. As you can see, in this example, the Politician has more control over the fate of his target. All he has to do is to invest in a communication campaign degrading his target before the fight.

Now, even more sophisticated: how about when the Politician knows many things about his target but orders them in crescendo? He knows he is a murderer but starts his communication campaign focusing on the fact that he is a thief? This gets him to destroy his target progressively by getting the crowd to cut his right arm the first month, the left leg the second and so on until the Politician discloses his target is in fact a murderer. That’ when the crowd will unanimously ask for his death.

Final level of sophistication: the target has an exogenous value. Let’s suppose the target is a prisoner of war and that his value is high enough for his kingdom of origin to worry about his well-being. The Politician can use this target as a diplomatic card to be played as many times as possible to achieve political goals. The Politician can progressively erode the target (or not) and plan its death at the exact time he knows his kingdom of origin is depleted of its possible incentives and has no more cards to play.

Q1131 “Drop after testimony.” R U learning yet? Q

So? If Rosenstein was imposed to Sessions by Dems in exchange of his confirmation, the smart thing to do is to immediately order all his past sins in crescendo and apply to him the prisoner of war model I have just described. The value of Rosenstein for his kingdom of origin is established here:

Q151 Why was AG Sessions’ confirmation challenged heavily? Why was RR’s confirmation smooth and easy? What was the vote count for RR?

The Senate confirmed Rosenstein as Deputy Attorney General with a bipartisan 94-6 vote while his boss Sessions only could secure a 52-47. This is proof Dems loooooove Rosenstein. Well, Gladiator Rosenstein, get ready for a rocky life at the Coliseum. You are going to need miles of Band-Aid and by the time Trump and Sessions are done with you, I hope you’ll still be able to crawl…

I told you in my post “Q is teaching us how to play the game of politics. Part 2: the Rosenstein multivariable differential equation” that there was a deal made to enable the Sessions confirmation in exchange for looking the other way regarding his and Mueller’s past sins, specifically Uranium 1. To find these posts, you may go to In the event Reddit tries to suspend his account again as they did for three days last week, you may also find SB2's posts on PWA's blog at In the earlier post, I explained that Rosenstein was the “glue” between Dems and the Trump Administration and that the deal involved dismissing the Uranium 1 case. Then, I asked the question: what if down the line, it was discovered that Rosenstein was involved in something bigger and did not disclose it to the Dems in Congress? What if, to get the job and hoping Trump and Sessions would not know, he did not disclose his involvement in FISA and even in bigger things? Yes, there is something bigger than FISA. It’s in the Q Board. It’s in Q1589. Look:

Q1589 Where are the JC / AM text messages?

You guys know the answer right? It’s right here:

Q1222 We have it all. Q

Rosenstein, Comey and McCabe, our 3 Coliseum Gladiators of the day, are involved in something bigger. Something so big, Rosenstein was hoping to be fired after the NY Times 25th Amendment article so that it would never surface and make it to public opinion.

Q1559 DECLAS LP “Viva Le Resistance.” Viv[a] vs Viv[e] [J C] Why classified by intel comm @ highest level? Define title. Define role w/ Mueller. Exchange shelters VERY senior member. Q

Let’s recap: Uranium 1, FISA, Secret Recordings, 25th Amendment Plot and “Viva Le Resistance.” These are the sins ordered in crescendo. With that in mind, take a close look at this picture of Gladiator Rosenstein and tell me if you still see his right arm and his left leg…


Now the relevant question is if the Maestro despises Rosenstein so much as expressed here why is he keeping him in the job and seems to overlook his secret recording intent and 25th Amendment nonsense. Here's President Trump's Comments During an 81-Minute Press Conference:

QUESTION: You have another meeting tomorrow with Rod Rosenstein —


QUESTION: Are you planning to fire Rod Rosenstein?

TRUMP: I’m talking to him, we’ve had a good talk. He said he never said it, he said he doesn’t believe it. He said he has a lot of respect for me, and he was very nice and we’ll see. And he’s a member of the Trump Administration, in that sense it’s the Justice Department.

I would certainly prefer not doing that, there was no collusion, there was no obstruction. I mean, unless you call obstruction the fact that I fight back — I do fight back, I really fight back. I mean, if you call that obstruction that’s fine. But there’s no obstruction, there’s no collusion — I’m going to meet with him tomorrow. I may call Rod tonight or tomorrow and ask for a little bit of a delay to the meeting, because I don’t want to do anything that gets in the way of this very important Supreme Court pick. So I don’t want it competing and hurting the decision, one way or the other, decision.

Again, I want to hear what she has to say, but I don’t want to do so — I may delay that. I’m going to see. I don’t want to do anything that’s going to conflict with that. But my preference would be to keep them and to let him finish up. You know, I call it a “witch hunt,” and it is a witch hunt.

video. [Please note: at the time of editing this video had been removed; therefore, I inserted the previous transcript in place of the intended video] Before answering to this question, did you catch he said he talked with Rosenstein? We all know they have not met since the NY Times article. My previous decode about Rosenstein calling is confirmed. Now let’s find the answer to the question. It’s at the 39 second mark. The Maestro says: “I may call Rod tonight or tomorrow and ask for a little bit of a delay to the meeting because I don’t want to do anything that gets in the way of this very important Supreme Court pick. So I don’t want it competing and hurting the decision one way or the other”. Do you see it? The Maestro could have met him in New York or before he left DC. Why does he want to meet him AFTER the Ford Senate testimony? This is the cool thing about prisoners of war who have things to hide to their kingdom of origin: you can use them whenever needed to achieve political goals. When Dems in Congress offer this:

Q2199 D's offering to [KILL] sexual assault allegation v Judge K in exchange for immediate pullback of DECLAS.

They don’t know that the declassification has more value for Rosenstein than for them. So? The smart thing to do is to use Rosenstein as the middle man to fix the mess artificially created by Feinstein and Co. And this is exactly what the Maestro is doing: "hey Rosenstein, I see you want to keep your job and that there are many things in the declassification process you don’t want out and that your friends are not aware of. Well, I’m not going to negotiate with your friends Feinstein and Co but I want Kavanaugh confirmed. If he is, I will be happy. If he’s not, I won’t. We’ll meet after Ford testifies in Senate so I can assess how much you tried to contribute to my happiness. It’s now up to you, making me happy will be your mission if you decide". This is what I suspect General Kelly told Rosenstein on behalf of the Maestro on Monday morning and this is why the cameras capturing them shaking hands was important: video.

Q’s pause after this meeting is an indication we now have to wait and see if Rosenstein will have his very trendy “I’m Spartacus” moment and put some order in his ranks to ensure his temporary survival or not. In the meantime:



Order your food kits at 888-440-8029 or

Please send donations for Hurricane Florence to:

Harrelson Center - Dr. Matt Cook Senior Pastor

20 North 4th Street STE 214 Wilmington, NC 28401

#serialbrain2decodesq #serialbrain2 #POTUS #presidenttrump #projectweepingangel #corruption

169 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All