Q Occult Series. Q114 US Military = Savior of Mankind. Origins of Mankind and his enemies. Part2.

Q Occult Series. Q114 US Military = Savior of Mankind. Origins of Mankind and his enemies. Part2.

They did their best to prevent SerialBrain2 from posting this part 2. EMP’s are real. When you are done reading this post or watching this Project Weeping Angel video re-watch this video portion, (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xESAbEllSrQ) . Praying and reading Holy Books neutralize their effect. Their 911’s ultimate warfare goal was to build the global aura-print database through airport body scanners. To locate your energy signature should they need to target you wherever you are in the world. Using your nudity against you is Satan’s oldest and favorite weapon. Since Adam and Eve. Before you enter these demonic body scanners, ask God to cover you and you will be safe. Yes, it’s as simple as that. Why? Because Satan’s devices are weak for the one who knows.

“Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices.” 2 Corinthians 2:11.

“Feeble indeed is the cunning of Satan.” Quran Sura 4 Verse 76.

So you want to know the origins of mankind and who is fighting mankind? You want to know what war Q is referring to? I told I will tell you. And in part 1.5, I prepared you: I told you all 3 Abrahamic religions needed to come together against the common enemy: Satan and his satanists. Not come together like the Pope wants them to, but like God wants them to. The Divine Creation of different cultures, languages, creatures and complexions, is a hint God wanted to be worshiped in different ways, but in ways He Himself revealed. The man who loves his wife buys her different dresses because he essentially wants to see different manifestations of her beauty. But if he sees a dress with an origin unknown to him, problems may occur… The Pope, on the other hand is trying to unite religions in a different way and with other motivations. I have already expressed it and will share it in extenso here. For example, the Pope is [fascinated by Islam] (https://www.commdiginews.com/world-news/pope-francis-holds-islam-blameless-for-terrorism-64229/)

because he saw how this community was willing to have their religion be omnipresent in their lives: real Muslims avoid interest accounts and even have to learn how to drink from a glass or how to eat. It's part of their religious practices. This obedience and submission would fascinate any controller. They figured: if we can hijack this thing and have the whole planet become Muslims, we are good to go for another 2,000 years. That is the only reason the Pope, is doing his belly dance for Islam and is clapping for the most evil ones among their so called leaders (artificially created in Clown factories) to dance to his NWO One Religion beat.

[Link1] (http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/05/pope-francis-1-640x480.jpg)

CHARLOTTE, N.C., May 19, 2016 — Pope Francis reiterated in an interview this week his stance that Muslims are not to blame for Islamic extremism.

“I don’t think that there is a fear of Islam as such but of ISIS and its war of conquest, which is partly drawn from Islam,” the pope told La Croix. “It is true that the idea of conquest is inherent in the soul of Islam. However, it is also possible to interpret the objective in Matthew’s Gospel, where Jesus sends his disciples to all nations, in terms of the same idea of conquest.”

Reasonable people can disagree, but it is a stretch to compare the concept of military conquest implied by “jihad” with the Christian concept of evangelization, and likewise to hold the West accountable for the 14 centuries of violence perpetrated by Islam.

The complexity of all things Middle Eastern makes it hard to assign full responsibility for anything that has happened there over the centuries to any one group. Depending upon your frame of reference, any side is culpable for any wrongs that have been committed there. But there can be no doubt that most of the terrorist activity that takes place on any given day in the world can be traced to Islam.

Christ did not send his disciples into the world to vanquish all other religions. His instruction was to spread the word of Christianity, not to kill innocent non-Christians for their beliefs.

[Link2] (https://cruxnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/daea1dc3898955518d87f0dbc9c4e5d0-1024x683.jpeg)

[Link3] (https://twitter.com/lsarsour/status/312787087856373761)

[Link4] (http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Linda-Sarsour-the-Lefts-latest-star-481651).

Jerusalem Post Opinion


I learned about Sarsour’s vicious attacks on Israel. She encouraged stoning the Israel Defense Forces.

Written BY DANIEL PIPES on FEBRUARY 15, 2017

Linda Sarsour speaks onstage during the Women's March on Washington on January 21, 2017 in Washington DC.

What to make of Linda Sarsour of Brooklyn, lead plaintiff in the lawsuit against US President Donald Trump’s immigration order and the new, seemingly ubiquitous symbol of the hard Left-radical Islam alliance?

The Obama White House designated her a “champion of change.” New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio sought her endorsement. Vermont’s Senator Bernie Sanders used her as a surrogate in his presidential campaign. She served as a delegate to the 2016 Democratic National Convention.

She appeared on major television shows and The New York Times ran a long puff piece calling her “a Brooklyn homegirl in a hijab.” David Brock’s Media Matters for America advocates for her. She was one of four lead organizers of the anti- Trump Women’s March on Washington.

Actress Susan Sarandon and Rep. Keith Ellison endorse her. Sarsour, in brief, is “venerated by leftists,” observes Muslim reformer Shireen Qudosi. And Islamists too: for example, Al-Jazeera celebrates her.

Sarsour plopped herself into my life in March 2010 when she confused me, Daniel Pipes, with PipeLineNews.org, a “boutique news service” that had run a critical article on her calling her a “Hamas sympathizer.” She responded by showering me with mock gratitude for the attention (“THANK YOU Mr. Pipes!”). Noting her error, I wrote a sarcastic response (“Sarsour ought to shower PipeLineNews.org, not me, with her affections”). When she did not acknowledge her mistake, I took an interest in her career.

I learned that Sarsour frequently errs without later correcting herself.

She wrongly portrayed the murder of Shaima Alawadi as resulting from hatred of Muslims when in fact Alawadi’s Muslim husband, Kassim Alhimidi, honor-killed her.

I learned about Sarsour’s paranoid loathing for the US government.

She portrayed would-be underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab as a CIA agent, implying that the federal government murders Americans to frame Muslims. She also off-handedly claimed Muslim “kids [are] being executed” in the United States, presumably by the government.

I learned about Sarsour’s promotion of Islamism. She endorsed Saudi Arabia because the application of Islamic law there brings such alleged benefits as paid maternity leave and no interest payments on credit cards.

I learned about Sarsour’s vicious attacks on Israel. She encouraged stoning the Israel Defense Forces. She posed for a photograph with Salah Sarsour, a former Hamas operative jailed by the Israeli authorities in the 1990s. She acknowledges having many male relatives in Israeli prisons.

I learned about Sarsour’s ignorance of history. She promotes a fantasy notion of Islam’s founder, Muhammad: “Our prophet was a racial justice activist, a human rights activist, a feminist in his own right. He was a man that cared about the environment. He cared about animal rights... He was also the first victim of Islamophobia.”

Her musings on American slavery caught my eye: “The sacrifice [that] the black Muslim slaves went through in this country is nothing compared to Islamaphobia [sic] today.”

I learned about Sarsour’s low reputation among her should-be allies.

Debbie Almontaser, an Islamist colleague, disparaged her immodesty and lack of humility. Feminist Aki Muthali called her a racist (read again that quote about black slaves). The anti-Zionist Ikhras website also accused her of harboring “an ugly racism towards African-Americans.”

Additionally, it characterized Sarsour’s public persona as “a masquerade inundated with pretense and exaggeration”; it portrayed her as fake religious; and it found her lacking a moral compass or “genuine convictions or principles.”

I learned how Sarsour answered critics with vitriolic vulgarity. Typical of her charm and grace, she said of Brigitte Gabriel and) Ayaan Hirsi Ali, two leading anti-Islamists (and the latter a victim of female genital mutilation), “I wish I could take their vaginas away – they don’t deserve to be women.”

I learned that Sarsour, a plain, illdressed woman in a lumbering hijab, indulges in coquettish vanity. She publicly boasts of her “striking good looks,” announces “I am beautiful,” and raves about “Such a beautiful photo taken of me.” Sarsour also clumsily self-inflates, for example, by referring to herself as one of the “amazing people.”

This long record of incompetence, extremism, vulgarity and eccentricity makes me wonder how Islamists and Leftists jointly swoon, as they do, over Linda Sarsour. If she’s their vaunted star, conservatives can rest easy.

Now that this is clarified, let’s open our Bible.

In Genesis 2:4-3:24, we learn how the serpent approached Eve and convinced her to eat from the Forbidden Tree. We learn how Adam and Eve got out of the Garden of Eden. Because of the Serpent.